|
You are here: Homepage > Library > What Johnny Can't Read .......... Censorship in American Libraries
by
Among my happiest memories are of rainy summer days tucked up under the eaves of our family's rustic lake cottage, a
gentle patter overhead, reading a book. The Hardy Boys. Black Beauty. Treasure Island. The
Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Anything by Rudyard Kipling. The Encyclopedia Britannica Junior's illustrated
volume on anatomy and The Catcher in the Rye. I was allowed to read what I liked. It helped me to learn who I was
and where I fit into the world.
Today many of the books I loved as a child have been banned in school libraries across the country. Black Beauty
has been removed from the shelves because it depicts cruelty to animals. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has
been banned because it contains the word n—–er. Most frequently, books are challenged because they
contain curse words or violence, sex, homosexuality, the occult, or rebellious children.
Banning books has become commonplace in the 1990s. From 1991 to 1994 the number of formal demands for the removal of
books from public and school libraries has increased by more than 50 percent. There were as many as 4,500 instances of
book challenges last year, and 42 percent of the complainants were successful in having the offending books banned (ALA
Office for Intellectual Freedom Data Bank).
We're not talking soft porn, racist drek and subversive witchcraft propaganda. Among the most-banned books are some of
the best-loved modern classics. In addition to The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, a list of the ten most-challenged
titles for 1994 compiled by the American Library Association includes Forever by Judy Blume, the Newbery
Award-winning Bridge to Terabithia by Katherine Paterson, The Chocolate War by Robert Cormier, Scary
Stories To Tell in the Dark, More Scary Stories, and Scary Stories 3 by Alvin Schwartz, and The
Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger (ALA).
At the head of the list was Daddy's Roommate by Michael Willhoite, about a day in the life of a boy whose divorced
father is in a monogamous homosexual relationship. One challenger in Mesa, Arizona, said the book is vile, sick and
goes against every law and constitution. The passion evident in this parent's complaint typifies the language of formal
book challenges filed with schools and public libraries all over the country.
But by far the most common type of censorship involves books quietly disappearing from libraries. Sometimes a parent who
objects to a book but doesn't want to go through a formal challenge just slips it off the shelf. Frequently a librarian who may
fear for her job removes a book that has become controversial. Because of the nature of stealth censorship, it
is difficult to document and impossible to quantify.
These quiet book bannings affect every aspect of the book world. Librarians, who buy at least half of hardcover literary trade
books published for children and young adults, have ever-tightening budgets and face a constricted job market. Under
pressure from administrators not to land their schools in the midst of controversy, many librarians have become increasingly
cautious about the kind of books they order.
Publishers, who have been cutting their lists because of economic pressures, respond by rejecting many manuscripts that
contain problematic language and stories on tough subjects like sexual abuse. And authors censor themselves, weeding out
curse words and steering away from difficult areas, regardless of feelings that such omissions affect the credibility of their
work.
It is surprising how limited the thinking of teachers and even librarians can be about censorship. Many well-meaning
professionals have inadvertently made innovative strides in the banning of books. The high school librarian in one town in
Florida told me, We don't have a problem with censorship here. She said she had avoided controversy by
putting bright pink slips in every book we think is controversial to warn parents to scrutinize the book before
their child reads it.
Parents who insist books they disapprove of should be unavailable to all children are not necessarily acting on their own.
Political-religious group such as the Christian Coalition and Citizens for Excellence in Education have circulated lists of books
with the aim of removing them from libraries (People for the American Way).
Many parents confuse a book's subject matter with the notion that the author or publisher advocates a particular moral
agenda and have come to regard books as enemies. For example, a book that contains profanity may be seen as one that
encourages kids to use bad language. Or a book that portrays a rebellious child is seen as urging children toward anti-family
behavior.
With few exceptions, literature's best, most important books are believable and compelling because they do contain material
that readers may find troubling. Take Katherine Paterson's National Book Award winner, The Great Gilly Hopkins,
which was banned in school libraries in Albemarle County, Virginia, because it contains curse words and takes God's
name in vain. The book is about a tough-talking, angry foster child who is redeemed by love. The parent who filed the
complaint listed the profanities in the book without reading it. The school board convened a panel of educators, who reviewed
the book and twice recommended it be kept on the shelves. The school superintendent ordered it removed anyway.
In an open letter to the Albemarle County School Board, Katherine Paterson wrote, Though Gilly's mouth is a very
mild one compared to that of many lost children, if she had said fiddlesticks when frustrated, readers could not
have believed in her and love would give them no hope.
One fifth-grade reader (whose teacher described him as the Gilly of my class) wrote in a book report of
The Great Gilly Hopkins, This book is a miracle. There is little doubt that if Mrs. Paterson's Gilly hadn't
cussed like a trooper that lost boy would have been denied his miracle.
One librarian at a conference on children's literature in Virginia this summer speculated as to why parents react so forcefully
to books they perceive as offensive. They feel helpless sending their children into a world that seems increasingly
plagued with hazards over which they have no control, she said. They see the books available to their children
as an area where they can have control.
Parents' attempts to protect their children from books that offend are misguided. For one thing, librarians say the primary
effect of keeping kids from reading a book is that they want to read it above all others. Children are tough and
discriminating. They hear language far worse than Gilly Hopkins' in the halls at school. Kids have eyes finely tuned for the
subtle and are more capable of grasping complexity than most adults give them credit for. I read Black Beauty
before I was twelve and learned a lot about compassion from it. I thought the Hardy Boys were sexist before I knew the
word. And I knew Rudyard Kipling for a racist without having to be told by a well-meaning adult.
Like Katherine Paterson's fifth-grade fan, it was miracles I was after, the momentary magic of transcendence that fired my
soul. Each book has its own gifts to offer, but the freedom to choose which to read teaches some of life's most important
lessons — trusting yourself, knowing what you believe in, tolerance — all of which are more difficult to learn
once you get beyond childhood.
| |||||||||||
Use of this website implies acceptance of this Legal Notice & Terms of Use. • • • In addition to original works (those created by this website's creator(s), owner(s), and/or their agents), Matt-Andersen.com contains and displays works for which the copyrights are held by other parties. For this reason, content and images on Matt-Andersen.com may not be saved or copied in any form without obtaining prior and express written permission. For more complete information regarding this site's usage of materials for which the copyrights are held by other parties, please see the copyright notice on the Legal Notice & Terms of Use page. • • • For all original works (created by this website's creator(s), owner(s), and/or their agents) contained and/or displayed herein, as well as the World Wide Web document set itself and its underlying source HTML files which implement the hypertext features, the following copyright notice shall apply: |